Is this test any good
5/6 Learning objectives
Define and calculate sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV
Describe the relationship between prevalence and predictive values
Describe accuracy and likelihood ratios as alternative methods of evaluating a diagnostic test
Sensitivity
How well the test detects people with the disease i.e true positives
% of positive test results in people with a disease
a/a+c
The test is "sensitive" i.e. good at identifying people with the disease: important for screening tests (e.g. RPR for syphilis, ELISA for HIV)
The test is "not sensitive" i.e. not good at identifying people with the disease (e.g. blood culture for typhoid)
Specificity
How well the test excludes people without the disease i.e true negatives
% of negative results in people without the disease
d/b+d
The test is "specific" for the disease: important as definitive tests (e.g. HIV, sputum culture for mycobacteria for pulmonary TB)
This test is "not-specific" (e.g. syndromic approach to vaginal discharge, RPR for syphilis)
Predictive value
% of positive/negative results that are true positive/negative
a/a+b or d/c+d
Depends on sensitivity/specificity of the test & the prevalence of disease in the population
Likelihood ratio
Alternative way of describing test performance): probability of disease after a positive or negative test result (e.g. LR+=sensitivity/1-specificity)